559
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
559 points (99.1% liked)
News
36366 readers
816 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
He drove at low speed, so he was clearly aiming more for intimidation than injury. Sounds kind of like terrorism, but he's right wing, so the only charge is assault.
I don't know about that. I bet they say the protestors were assaulting and terrorizing the poor car by getting in its way
And like that, the AI robot army they're building gets rights.
I'm sure the GOP will be working overtime to try and brush that under the rug.
Do they even have to? All trump will have to say is that the guy is a great patriot and will invite him to next SOTU.
I can already hear him saying something like “maybe I should just change the law that says you can’t drive into protesters, who knows. maybe that’s something we’ll have to look into.”
That's already a thing in Florida.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/04/ron-desantis-anti-riot-bill
I mean.......I honestly can't tell if you're getting wooshed by the original comment, or if you get it and I'm being wooshed by you.
Be given the medal of freedom and a ride in a tesla
promoted to sidewalk safety czar
Maybe we'll get lucky and the Tesla will lock him in while it self immolates.
In Florida it's legal to run over protestors, maybe they will make that a federal rule
Christ. 😂
Terrorism does aim for injury though.
It can. It also may not.
He is MAGA and the two tier justice system will rule it self defense.
its florida, you can reasonablly expect it to be a right winger.
This sounds more like chaos than terrorism to me. (edit, added:) Regardless of the car you're in, what would you do if you found yourself surrounded by people who want to hurt the vehicle you're driving?
Unless it's a Cybertruck with a MAGA sticker on it, then please just assume it's someone like you who just hasn't found a way to get rid of their car and is probably now terrified to just go to the store.
We've got to temper our anger, because fury isn't going to help anyone
Love the exonerative tense here. He just ‘found himself’ surrounded by protestors out of the blue, not that his vehicle aimed directly at and drove through the crowd.
i skipped over the part where he deliberately drove onto the sidewalk. you're right
Quit your bullshit. If this guy wasn't a terrorist, he would've stopped and backed up before getting anywhere near the protestors.
yeah, you're right. i must have scanned over this part, but i saw it again when you replied. he drove up onto the sidewalk.
How come you had no problem editing your original comment to add to your point, but when your entire argument gets shut down you decide to leave it up unedited?
posterity. (edited to add:) people learn and grow. i think it's probably best to show that to others. i hope you're not as offended by this edit.
I think the point of my comment was missed.
I have no problem with the edit, because I was referring to editing a comment to add things to the bottom, not to change the comment completely.
All one would need to do is to add a comment to the bottom of the comment saying, "I have since learned that I was wrong" or something. But you didn't.
However, you did do that when it came to adding to your point. So clearly you're aware of the possibility and chose to leave the disinformation up.
This is actually good debate etiquette in my opinion. I have no issue going and having the conversation however it happens, but as soon as you take my argument apart I'm gonna leave it as is so that others can see the learning opportunity that I had
I think you misunderstood...
I meant that they had no problem adding an edit to the end when it's adding to their point, but when their entire point is shot down, they don't add a comment indicating that everything you just read is wrong.
That is not good ettiquite, as anyone reading the conversation in passing might not make it to the part of the thread where the person realizes they were wrong and admits it. They just see the original, wrong, unedited comment.
Actually yeah, I see your point and that's something I've done before. Just something like
Edit: Got this one wrong
He wasn't "surrounded" by anyone until he intentionally choose to drive in to the crowd.