251
submitted 4 days ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

Redeveloping public owned lands in cities should be a start. I've been to community meetings to discuss redeveloping federal land in Ottawa.

Ottawa has a significant amount of federal land. Transforming unused federal office space to mixed used residential will be a game changer.

There is a crown corp that now owns public federal land and is either redeveloping for mixed use or for tourism:

https://www.clc-sic.ca/

They also own the CN Tower. Beefing this up would be great.

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

The feds own a lot of land in downtown Ottawa. Tunney's Pasture alone is huge. I'm not sure that's true elsewhere. Does Thunder Bay have a sizeable block of federally owned land, for example?

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

I don't know. You'd have to look that up.

I'm from Ottawa, not Thunder Bay so I cannot answer that question.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 days ago

I mean, even in Ottawa is there actually enough federal land for that to matter? And if it's not enough there, there definitely isn't enough in Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Victoria, etc.

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

There's enough in Ottawa for sure. Remember the NCC is also a Federal Commission not Provincial nor Municipal. But also there is a lot of federal agencies present in Ottawa (because it is the Capital) looking to move out of their current facilities/office space.

I understand it is highly location specific. There's a significant impact in Ottawa and, because I am speaking as someone from Ottawa, I made a comment about it. Considering that Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Victory, etc. are not the Federal Capital, this particular policy would not affect those cities as much or at all, depending. Again, it having a positive impact in once city but not everywhere while at the same time there being no negative effect should not mean the policy should not be looked at. It's good for Ottawa, at least, and not bad for anyone? So what's the problem with that?

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
251 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

9400 readers
1193 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS