469
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Osti de tabarnak de calice!

Seriously though, this is a coincidence that he says this at the same time Carney says he wants Québec to roll back law 96.

Our French language protection laws is nobody's business but our own.

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

CBC's coverage says his problem isn't with the law itself:

Blanchet's criticism follows Carney's remarks Monday that a government led by him would act as an intervenor at the Supreme Court of Canada should it ever hear a challenge to Bill 96.

Carney said he would do so not because he has a problem with the legislation, but because he opposes any province's pre-emptive use of the notwithstanding clause to pass laws.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
469 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

9385 readers
1603 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS