823
submitted 1 week ago by GreyAlien@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world

U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel

So you are telling me you could DEFINITELY have saved innocent lives in Yemen but chose not to because there could have "CONCEIVABLY" been harm done to US military personnel?

“I will say a prayer for victory,” Vance wrote. (Two other users subsequently added prayer emoji.)

Oof. Death cult through and through.

[-] Nikelui@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

As much as this entire clown show raises ethical questions, I don't think anyone would risk to be charged of treason (or "domestic terrorism", that seems to be popular right now) on the basis of a shady group chat.

I don’t think anyone would risk to be charged of treason

At some point treason becomes a civil duty. Maybe not this point, but what im worried about is that nobody opposed to the Trump regime is willing to commit treason. Treason is only bad if the people in power are good. If the people in power are bad then treason is a necessity.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Tell me honestly if you were added to such a chat would you think it serious or some sort of military larp chat?

Then tell me you'd be able to contact the houthis in less than 2h much less being trusted about it or any sort of secretive about it?

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I probably cant contact the relevant yemeni authorities privately but this guy probably could have. Also confirming a few phone numbers to rule out the larp idea is surely not impossible for a journalist of this level. To prepare for both of those he had 3 days btw not 2h.

Even if you didnt do it privately, you could just share the info anonymously with the public. That wouldnt prevent the strike because it would just be delayed but it would have still been a decent warning.

Basically anything is better than doing nothing, giving Trump a win and letting people die for political games.

Just publishing the messages about "bailing out europe" before the strike would have made trump look stupid. But instead this "journalist" played for the bigger scoop to make a name for himself while accomplishing nothing but some short term entertainment.

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
823 points (99.2% liked)

World News

45329 readers
1929 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS