125
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 days ago

I appreciate the privacy-first model, but I don't think I can ever go back to paid subscriptions for my photo and video storage. Not only does it cost a fortune over time, but when the company eventually folds or changes their policy for the worst, it's a nightmare to get your photos and videos to another platform.

Self-hosting is what I prefer, although, I can appreciate that it's not an option for everyone.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the case of ente, they have gone above and beyond to give full control to their users of their backing up process and backed up media:

  • they provide a sync feature from ente to a local destination on your computer using the desktop app. It can run continuously to reflect all changes to your media and its organization in ente.
  • they provide a CLI, so that you can program and implement your own export behavior it seems.

To me, it really shows they care about the users and do their best to avoid vendor lock-in.

And I personally feel much more confident in a company when their business model is a paid one. I'm a very happy customer, I have also convinced multiple people who seem happy too.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I don't mean to talk negatively at all, and their product looks amazing (especially with the added context you've provided).

For me, based on my own experience and the huge amount of storage needed to keep my photos/videos safe, it's not cost-effective for me personally. If the choice was any of the other paid services or Ente, I think Ente would be the clear winner from the sound of it.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

I didn't take it as a critique of Ente, not to worry! I'm not affiliated in any way, I just wanted to provide some context to people who may be concerned about the vendor locking aspect specifically.

Of course how you manage your media, your needs and your finances are all a very personal matter, I also self-host my photo backup, but I use ente in a complementary fashion, and I don't backup everything to it. It just makes it convenient to collect, share and aggregate media between ente members and non-members.

Cheers!

[-] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 days ago
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Is it?? They don't make that evident anywhere on their website. All I see is a pricing page with no hint that it can be self-hosted.

[-] Mates@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Thank you. Any reason why they wouldn't make it more apparent from their homepage? I'm always interested in self-hosted solutions, and even I ducked out of there after seeing only subscription plans being offered.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

...why would they? Self-hosting loses them business.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Has that killed Bitwarden yet? There are many self-hosted projects that also have paid options.

I'd be happy with a paid (one-time fee) license for a self-hosted option with any software. Subscriptions should only be paying for data/storage, and if that's offloaded to the customer's local hardware, there's no need to keep them on a subscription.

Especially for a product that's privacy-first, that really should include a self-hosted option (paid or otherwise).

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

I didn't say anything about "killing".

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

You implied that it would hurt business, and that really doesn't seem to be the case for other projects using a self-hosted/subscription business model.

If you meant something else, then I guess I misunderstood. No harm, no foul.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Fair enough. I still don't think that being open about their self-hosted option would hurt them.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe not. That's my best guess as to why they wouldn't advertise it on the homepage.

[-] pipes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

A software's website and docs are very telling, aren't they? It's like a cultural thing from the creators, some open source software will always be more business oriented, others are more helpful towards homelab /self-hosting users.

[-] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

See their github for self-hosting.

[-] szszl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~Ente is self-hostable~~

Edit: nvm, somebody already pointed that out

[-] peregus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Have you tried/are you using Immich?

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I may have tried the demo at some point (along with other Self-hosted solutions for photo backup), but Synology Photos does what I want without any real setup.

For search, I use a paid software called Excire Foto (German origin) that uses local-AI. I point it to my network folder, and it creates its own database away from my originals. Expensive software, but it's been worth it. Synology photos also has searching by subject, but Excire is far more contextual and easily beats out anything that Google Photos offered.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

when the company eventually folds or changes their policy for the worst, it's a nightmare to get your photos and videos to another platform.

That's why "portability" is important. Ente matches this bar for me.

But yeah, when it comes to one-off products like this you need 1 subscriptions for photos, one subscription for files, one subscription for docs, etc. Honestly that's the reason I use Proton.

[-] TIN@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

Does proton have a photos solution?

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Yes and no. It's super rudimentary. Android-only auto-backup through the app. It puts them into their own partition. You can't manually upload anything.

[-] Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Not a good one, so no.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

their service is very cheap, though. but yeah if you can selfhost it, and expose it to family that's good

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Like with all other online services, it's cheap until your collection grows. I basically outpaced Google Drive (at the time), and it would have been significantly more expensive to continue with their paid plans. So, I invested in hardware. LOL

But realistically, if you have a smaller photo/video collection, then I think it would be just as easy to spend $5-10 a month and forget about it. I was working with decades worth of images, so I would quickly outgrow any 1, 2, 3TB plans.

How do you back up your media?

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

My Synology NAS is set up as RAID, so there's redundancy built in.

Then I have daily backups to an external drive (automatic, so there's no intervention).

In addition to (automatic) daily encrypted cloud backup (which I'm looking for an alternative due to rising costs). Ideally, I'd love to set up a second, smaller NAS somewhere else to offset the cloud backup costs.

Then I have a monthly backup on physical media kept secured outside of my home.

But my NAS handles way more than just photos and video, so this low effort is really covering all kinds of data.

I made the switch to self-hosting in part to reduce subscription costs of various services, and I'm sure that by now my setup has paid for itself.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
125 points (99.2% liked)

Privacy Guides

18657 readers
118 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS