230

Collection of potential security issues in Jellyfin This is a non exhaustive list of potential security issues found in Jellyfin. Some of these might cause controversy. Some of these are design fla...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Put the instance behind another authentication point like a VPN or reverse proxy with SSO. That will prevent the wider Internet from accessing it without legitimate users being cut off. You should be doing this with any server you operate (like Plex), but definitely one that may have legal implications.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago

aaaand now you smart tv can't connect. none of them. the clients dont even support http basic auth creds put into the URL for some crazy reason.

for advanced HTTP-level authentication you would need to run a reverse proxy on the TV's network that would add the authentication info. for the VPN idea you would need to tunnel the TV's network's internet connection at the router. or set up a gateway address in the TVs network settings that would do that. or use a reverse proxy here too so that it repeats the request to the real server.

but honestly, this is the real and only secure way anyway. I wouldn't be comfortable to expose jellyfin even if the devs are real experts. I mean vulns get discovered, in dotnet, jellyfin dependencies, linux filesystem, and reverse proxy, and honestly who has time to always tightly keep up to date with all that.

that's not to discount the seriousness of the issue though, it's a real shame that jellyfin is so much against security

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Your smart TV is (presumably) on your local network, so you should be routing the requests locally (point the client at the local ip, assuming it didn't autodiscover it) not through the VPN/ tunnel.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago

Your smart TV is (presumably) on your local network

often, but not always. sometimes the TV is at a different house, when you are a guest or at a second property

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Or even just on a differently vlan that you want to go through your reverse-proxy because that is where your security features are to separate you from shit you don't trust.

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In which case there are still ways to make it work, like putting in an SSO bypass rule for the IP of your other property. Point is, under no circumstances is it impossible to both have it be protected against scanning attacks like the ones described in the gh issue, and keep it available to use over the internet for authorized users.

[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

I am sorry, I don't think I follow, I am CGNATED anyway, so I need to use VPNs to access my server (if IPv6 is not available, for IPv4 I am experimenting with Tailscale funnels as of now).

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

You should already be fine in that case.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
230 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38459 readers
336 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS