75
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Context:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

It was clear for me, too. However, a lot of people struggle to tell apart two things when you use the same word to refer to them, and that's one of those cases.

My suggestion in this regard is to always use "state of Israel" instead. You'll still get some bans, but it becomes harder for supporters of the genocidal state to claim "no, ur teh 1 defending genoside".

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This would require acknowledging Israel as a state, which it is not.

Nobody uses the term "state of Israel to refer to it. Demonstrated by the title of the posted article "Israel announces expansion...". Not a single person raises the question if this means a person called "Israel" is planning to become so obese that they occlude the Gaza strip.

The word "Israel" suffices and the .World moderators know perfectly well what is means. There is no ambiguity to hide behind.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

This would require acknowledging Israel as a state, which it is not.

Israel is a government controlling a population and a territory. It is a state by definition. To claim otherwise is fucking stupid.

And that's central here. A state is an "it"; unlike human beings, it has no right to defend itself. And it should be dismantled once it harms actual people, just like Nazi Germany was.

Demonstrated by the title of the posted article

Yeah, just like article titles demonstrate English has no articles. Pfffft.

Not a single person raises the question

That's why you totally weren't banned for "racism", as if you were targetting actual people instead of a genocidal power structure, right? Right??? Oh wait.

The word “Israel” suffices

This sounds exactly the same as

"Since I'm too stubborn to avoid falling into the sort of trap nationalists love to set up, I'll keep helping the Zionists and clueless muppets to equate «attacks against Israel» = «racism»."

You might not be a Zionist but you're certainly eager to contribute with them.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago

An occupation is not a state. If controlling an area and population with government would make something a state, the RSF in Sudan would be a state and Crimea would be transferred into Russia the moment it got occupied.

Your comment is the definition of

"This is hurting your cause - person against cause"

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago

If controlling an area and population with government would make something a state, the RSF in Sudan would be a state

"But what about the RSF?"

That said, yes, the RSF is either a state already or really close to one.

Crimea would be transferred into Russia the moment it got occupied.

Crimea is disputed by two states and under effective control of one (Russia). "Congrats" for proving Russia is a state.

Your comment is the definition of // “This is hurting your cause - person against cause

Emphasis mine. I outright compared that crap with Nazi Germany, so stop lying / assuming / bullshitting that I would be against the cause of getting rid of it.

That said if the expression "state of Israel" makes you so uncomfortable, you could use any other expression of your choice, as long as it leaves clear that you're referring solely to the power structure and not the population.

Unless you'd rather keep being the zionists' little plaything in their language game, and actually help them to spread their idiotic and immoral "noooooo, people defending the Palestinians are Nazi" babble. Because that's what you're doing here.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You are out here recognizing the RSF and ISIS as states to defend Israel and think anyone will take you seriously?

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 15 hours ago

to defend Israel

I am not defending Israel. Please stop being a liar.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You recognize Israel thus you defend Israel.

Ask the Palestinians what they call their occupier.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

You recognize Israel thus you defend Israel.

A state is an instrument of oppression dammit. To recognise "X is a state" is NOT the same as defending X.

So, again, stop being a liar. (Actually it's worse, you're being a dumb fuck.)

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -2 points 14 hours ago

Saying people need to recognize Israel to advance the Palestinia cause is defending Israel. Palestinians do not recognize Israel for a reason.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

To pretend that the state is not there is simply not feasible. It's wishful belief - this shit harms more than it helps.

And, again: if you really want to die in this weird hill there are other ways to refer to that power structure, as long as you make sure the zionists can't distort your discourse from "it should be gone" into "they should be gone".

Palestinians do not recognize Israel for a reason.

If this anyhow helped, we wouldn't be discussing this. Nor there would be piles of civilian bodies in Gaza, murdered by the state of Israel.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

You would love the Abraham Accords.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
75 points (77.4% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
229 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS