180
submitted 2 days ago by NoahFuel@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net

"Mario 64 was 60 dollars in 1995 meaning that it would be about 100 dollars today"

Pay has NOT kept up with inflation. People are poorer.

Folk need to stop pretending like people have as much money as they did in the 90s. Rent costs, house prices are astronomical.

Xbox's business is still impacted today by outpricing people with their initial Xbox One reveal pricing a decade ago.

Nintendo Treehouse comments are absolutely packed with people complaining about prices.

Again, I'm vastly aware that game budgets, inflation etc have increased!

but Pay has NOT increased accordingly. I don't know the solution, but that's the reality.

And I make these points as someone who is lucky enough to earn well enough to just buy them regardless. Most aren't as fortunate.

Game bubbles regularly disregard the poor, unfortunately, as the industry has an above-average number of middle-class background workers.

Price increases combined with physical knock effectively prices the poor out of legally gaming (Buying directly from them/the digital store)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 9to5@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

While I agree that Mario 64 is genre defining, I could probably name 20 indie games that I find more fun, ( subjective I know) without much difficulty. I would even go as far as to say that Hollow Knight or Celeste easily rival Mario 64 in terms of enjoyment, even if they arent as historically significant.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
180 points (100.0% liked)

games

20806 readers
497 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS