view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I mean hopefully?
That's not what I'm talking about here. Of course the hypocrisy there is also ridiculous, but that's not what I'm trying to say. My point is: Liberals seem to have more of a problem with the bad opsec than with the actual mass murder. As if competently murdering brown people in the hundreds is somehow better than incompetently murdering them. This is the reaction of people who are only marginally opposed to mass murder.
Understood.
My point: the world is slowly becoming overrun by people that are not opposed to mass murder at all.
So why should we spend any effort towards measuring what level we're each opposed to mass murder, instead of actually opposing it while it's happening?
It's wasteful at best, and creates fractures in a needed united front against mass murdering corporate narcissists at worst.
Albeit a valid criticism of libs, it's not productive towards solving any growing problem in any way. It is punching down on a group that Trump already has his boot on. Yet you're enjoying the boot, and feel it's earned, instead of aligning with the people it's on who you clearly agree more with.
At the rate the US is going, there won't be many libs left to laugh at once that boot is finished with them.
So I'll save my criticism of their behavior after I know for sure they'll still be around to criticize. Until then, anyone under that boot is my ally despite any political differences.
Mostly because I'm mad. I mean this is the Fediverse not a council meeting that will decide the fate of the Free World™, there's nothing wrong with doing wasteful things. Also since I'm not American I'm not a member of the coalition you're trying to build anyway.
That united front will never happen. Ideologically committed liberals will always side with fascists against leftists or try to win on their own; it's just how they're made. The ~~Gestapo~~ ICE will be knocking on your door and they'll still argue that a UBI is going too far and they can't support your program. Don't believe me? Look at what the Dem leadership is doing. Liberals simply don't consider people to their left allies, but rather threats to their capitalist overlords. Not that that has anything to do with this conversation, but yeah.
Huh? I never said anything about any boots being earned.
Agreed.
But I prefer to live a productive life instead of a wasteful one.
Especially when wasting your life involves picking on a currently oppressed group instead of their oppressors. If your anger stems from liberals lack of empathy, you are certainly lacking it towards them now that they're oppressed.
So if you want to waste your life being an angry hypocrite in this way, I will not stop you, but I will point it out.
And let me know where in the world you're living if you feel you are currently safe from the Russia fueled right-wing populist hate machine. I'd gladly move there to escape the grip they are tightening on the world.
Especially considering how effectively they dismantled the US, have now weaponized their military (the largest in the world by several factors), and have publicly stated their interest to take over Canada, Greenland, and Panama.
If there's a safe place on this planet that escapes their grasp, let me know, especially since you already feel:
Seeing as a united front is the only way this ends well for humanity instead of Oligarchs, I guess we'll have to wait 4 years to find out if you're just being wasteful, or dangerously naive.