202
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mallspice@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t think were replacing plastic anytime soon but using materials smarter is always nice.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

But we should, because plastic is made of oil. And that oil goes CO², be it because it's burned or because it rots away in nature.

[-] Mallspice@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Environmental stability is very important but we should master how we use materials, not discount their usefulness entirely, as that is more empowering to our species.

Like sure we can make oil cars outdated and that may be a good thing, but we’d still use it in grease.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There are many cases where a chemical had to be entirely replaced with a more targeted or less damaging variant because of environmental considerations. Most prominent being CTFE, because it affected the ozone layer.

[-] Mallspice@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think grease is the better example. Interesting. Is it actually feasible to phase out crude oil?

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, bad example, i rewrote my answer.

And yeah, i think so. Problem currently is, that alternatives are more expensive. That could be solved with oil production and export being appropriately taxed to the damages it causes.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
202 points (96.3% liked)

science

18043 readers
75 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS