132
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Because they do not know the name of the killed person.

Presumably that's been in play since the start of the war. It can't be they've know the names of everyone up until last month.

From the Telegraph article: "The Hamas lists contain information such as names and ID numbers, and can be filled in by anyone with a link to the Google form for the document."

How does this translate to "Hamas admits 72% of those killed a combat ages males."?

From the Telegraph article, “The demographics are the most important thing in all this. We’ve heard the claims that about 70 per cent of the deaths are women and children, and these lists, especially the most recent, show that’s complete nonsense,”

And then: "About 72 per cent of fatalities aged 13-55 are men, which is the rough age range of Hamas combatants"

So the word "admits" is doing some unfair lifting there, but the main point of the OP article is that the MoH revised their casualty numbers by removing some 3,200 "fully identified" names, including 1,080 children.

The obvious way to check this would be to look at the actual MoH reporting - which is what I can't find anywhere. They must be somewhere but I don't know where.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Hamas does not use 13 year olds as soldiers. This makes absolutely no sense and your comment is complete lie. It is clear you are here to spread an agenda and are not arguing in any good faith.

The Hamas list also did not change. The person from New York just made up bullshit by comparing different lists to eachother and pretending they were the same.

A google search shows they are likely using the same lie as the previous time as reports from today cite the same misinformation Zionist think tank.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

This makes absolutely no sense and your comment is complete lie.

You mean the quoted comment.

It is clear you are here to spread an agenda and are not arguing in any good faith.

My agenda is finding those reports. My faith is good AF.

The Hamas list also did not change.

Okay, that's your claim at odds with the articles, so please show they didn't change - please just show the Palestinian Ministry of Health casualty numbers with demographics for Feb 2025 and March 2025.

I'm ready to accept that they didn't change, but I can't find them at all, that's my point. If you know where they are, link them.

My guess is that you don't know where they are and are just pissed that an Israel-supporting article is calling out stats for being false. I would be pissed too if I knew that was false.

So again, we're looking for proof of a decrease (or, as you say, no decrease - whichever it is) in Palestinian Ministry of Health casualty figures from the early part of this year, with the demographic details. Please find.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
132 points (91.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7521 readers
2842 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS