15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

It's almost impressive how quickly the whole of the business world capitulated to Donald Trump.

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

It’s almost like their support for these issues was never genuine to begin with.

[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Was yours? Commenting online isn't exactly fighting the good fight. Did you do anything to help shore up and defend anything.

These companies face legal action from the government that was elected. A government elected who won power by spreading their shitty ideology everywhere.

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I’m not talking about personal actions. I personally believe in equality and I wish I could do more about that even if there are all sorts of personal reasons that’s difficult for me.

Corporations don’t believe anything. They’re just profit optimizing machines. They were doing rainbow capitalism when they thought it would be more profitable and now that they think the opposite is more profitable, they’ll do that. It’s as simple as that and hoping corporations would be allies in a fight for equality was always based on a misunderstanding about power.

It’s not like corporations don’t have power that can resist government action. Look at how effectively they’ve evaded taxes and regulations. The big international ones can threaten to take their ball and leave if they don’t like a country’s policies. And that’s when they don’t just bribe politicians to change them.

The workers at those companies are people though. Labor organizing was always going to be necessary to build up power for change. Not saying it’s easy and I can’t fault someone for worrying about losing their job, but if resistance was going to happen anywhere that’s where it would be. Not in boardrooms or alone in a booth.

But there’s the difference. It’s one thing to have convictions but not the means or courage to act on them. It’s another thing to have power, but lack convictions beyond whatever is currently convenient. The former could overcome those obstacles given the right circumstances. The latter never will.

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

What are you doing? Why are you swinging on someone clearly with you?

[-] brysmi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Gosh, Melvin, what a hero you are.

[-] LinyosT@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Ilandar@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

MELVIN USED MORAL SUPERIORITY

BUT IT FAILED

IT HURT ITSELF IN ITS CONFUSION

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

Commenting online is fighting the good fight. Online sentiment is shifted by commenting online and online sentiment plays a huge role in influencing the acceptable opinions.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's too hard to change anything, but only if it's progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well. Being a bigoted asshole is easy.

Actually being inclusive and nice to people takes effort.

[-] TheEntity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's too hard to change anything if one believes in laws, rules and the general idea of a fair justice. They don't have this limitation.

[-] Sizing2673@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is what's fucking shitty about this

Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

It's like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

They didn't capitulate. They never fought. They just did what was the best shot at earning money and gaining ground at the time.

Don't ever expect moral based behavior in capitalism or geopolitics.

[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

They didn't capitulate. They were mostly faking it all along, friend. It made for good profit at the time and to get good Blackrock or Vanguard investment money. This is why despite putting rainbows in X, or FB, or YT, or LinkedIn profiles in the USA or in some Western countries, no company ever did that in any profile outside the West. It was all for show... and money. If they actually believe it they would have done so across the board. Yet they didn't. They were just hoping most people wouldn't notice. Many did. There was a meme RE: this floating around from years ago, too.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69047 readers
2892 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS