92
submitted 1 month ago by Domino@lemmings.world to c/world@quokk.au

The United States will seek to force the European Union to choose between the US and China on trade, according to briefings circulated to senior ministers and officials after Tánaiste Simon Harris’s meeting in Washington last week with US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 month ago

I see no possibility that the EU will, if forced to choose, choose anyone other than China.

Russia and the US have both clearly signaled to the EU that they cannot be trusted. I see no reason why the EU would do anything other than believe them.

[-] Timbits@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

China likewise has shown itself to be equally as untrustworthy. It openly supports Russia during it's invasion of Ukraine for starters, even the US is pretending to barely support Ukraine.

The EU should not bog itself down with the three tyrants.

[-] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

Right, but China is untrustworthy in a standard international wheeling and dealing sense, while Russia and the US are both direct, existential threats to the EU and its constituent nations.

Yes - they'd be best off avoiding entanglements with all three, but their very survival might depend on allying with China against an overtly hostile Russia and US.

[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trump: dump china if you want to be my friend

EU: no thanks

China: Finally, I've wanted to be friends for so long

EU: no thanks

[-] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

That would certainly be a good way to play it.

But really- the EU doesn't want to alienate China too much, because the time could easily come when having China at their back is the only thing that saves them from being spit-roasted by a US/Russia alliance.

[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Totally, then shouldn't be rude about it but it looks like to me they want to keep some safe distance from both the coming years. Maybe pull a Switzerland if it actually comes to ww3, but let's hope not.

[-] Minnels@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

It's a sad world where you always have to consider your actions to not escalate toward a new world war. Things went from okay to bad really quick.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Id use the descriptor volatile for the US and Russia

[-] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess, in the same sense that ones relationship with two hungry-looking men with their hands wrapped around suspicious bulges in their pockets, advancing on you from opposite ends of a dark alley and already arguing over who gets to keep your watch might be considered "volatile."

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
92 points (96.0% liked)

World News

1124 readers
540 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS