168
submitted 3 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 132 points 3 weeks ago

This article has many great points. It cannot be overstated how demoralizing it is watching all these people with influence and power just burning this place up without a care. They could avoid taking that jet to a different state and back in one day, but they have the ability to do it and choose to do so anyway. My plastic straws seem to amount to tardigrade dicks next to these individuals dumping tonnes of pollutants each day.

[-] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I agree with your message, but the plastic straw issue has always been contemptible and a worthless form of virtue signaling in the context of each person's climate impact.

'Oh, no plastic straws for me, please! I want to save the planet,' spoken before reaching out the window of an air-conditioning-blasting, gas-guzzling SUV to grab a fistful of single-use plastic everything else and factory-farmed beef patties.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah thats actually exactly why I said it. The solution to a lot of our problems exist and some even simple. Our entire lives have just been arranged to service the oligarchy.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why do think they pushed recycling so hard instead of reduce and reuse. Recycling did not damage their bottom line and they lied about it.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

All you gotta do to know the plastic bans were bullshit is to look at the sheer volume of disposable plastic that goes into your shopping cart.

Shopping bags and straws were targeted because they impact consumers, not corporate supply chains.

It's the classic move of individualising a systemic problem to distract people from focusing on the actual source. It was pioneered with littering, then recycling, carbon footprint, and others. The research shows it works to take the heat off of corporations, and the "solutions" that get sold to us don't work. None of them do.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 22 points 3 weeks ago

amount to tardigrade dicks

Thank you for your contribution to our culture today. I will make very good use of this.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
168 points (95.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6518 readers
227 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS