91

https://archive.is/2nQSh

It marks the first long-term, stable operation of the technology, putting China at the forefront of a global race to harness thorium – considered a safer and more abundant alternative to uranium – for nuclear power.

The experimental reactor, located in the Gobi Desert in China’s west, uses molten salt as the fuel carrier and coolant, and thorium – a radioactive element abundant in the Earth’s crust – as the fuel source. The reactor is reportedly designed to sustainably generate 2 megawatts of thermal power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

I can't find a clear source on this. Could you help? This one says 2013 http://thorenergy.no/

[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

According to GPT-4.1:

In 1959, Norway achieved a notable milestone by starting up its first nuclear reactor, the JEEP I (Joint Establishment Experimental Pile), located at Kjeller. This reactor was primarily used for research purposes, including early experiments with alternative nuclear fuels such as thorium. While JEEP I itself was not a thorium reactor per se, it laid the groundwork for subsequent Norwegian research into thorium as a nuclear fuel. This early phase demonstrated Norway's scientific interest in thorium, leveraging its domestic thorium resources and contributing to later thorium reactor experiments.

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Worse than useless. None of this is shown to be true without a source.

[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I hope it's not "worse than useless" (which would mean "misleading"), as my goal was simply to find more identifiers for discussion or research beyond those provided: norway, thorium, 1959...

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm sorry to come on so strong -- I don't think it's worse than useless as a tool to approach the right answers -- but as I saw people upvoting this 'answer' without doing any checking, it occurs to me that this is how misinformation spreads. I hope my comment makes more sense in that context.

[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

So....

  1. Not a Thorium reactor

  2. Didn't produce any power

So China still has a win here.

[-] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Norway has one of the worlds largest deposits of thorium, but I have ot heard that we had a working reactor, just the principle of one.

If the chinese has indeed made it work I think we need to prepare for USA wanting to annex Norway as well

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
91 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

69729 readers
1863 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS