I'm providing my thought's in a separate comment, so the source can stand on it's own.

To me this doesn't exactly read like a hit piece. If anything, it reads like commentary on well intentioned legislation that wasn't thought out thoroughly enough, and ended up providing perverse incentives that were in many ways worse than the problem they set out to solve.

Now it wouldn't surprise me if somebody took advantage of the situation, but it doesn't necessarily implicate the Obama government.