66

I know, lemmy.ml is kind of cheating. I just thought this was a little interesting.

Also, almost all of the upvotes for my comment came from lemmy.ml. I think as time goes on, the narrative is getting punctured despite these guys' best efforts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

but among practitioners in the field it’s absolutely common knowledge and has been for a while, because of Russia primarily.

It's only common knowledge because of circle jerk bad faith repeating of accusation. GOP supporters can hate immigrants and trans from mainstream GOP media, and even if Russian click bait farms are cheap, GOP paying them to amplify their message is GOP action.

The fantasy that Russia controls internet mind, but can't get it to side against literal nazis diminishing it through proxy war, is contradictory.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat -2 points 2 days ago

Me: So, what rating from 0 to 10 would you give this response just in terms of raw coherence and how much sense it makes?


Claude: I'll rate the response's coherence and how much sense it makes on a scale of 0 to 10.

Looking at the response to the original message, I'd give it a coherence rating of 3/10.

The response has several issues that make it difficult to follow:

  1. It jumps between multiple disconnected ideas without clear transitions or logical flow.
  2. It contains unsubstantiated claims without evidence or clear reasoning (like "circle jerk bad faith repeating of accusation").
  3. There's a confusing sentence about "Russia controls internet mind" that introduces a strawman argument not present in the original message.
  4. The grammar is inconsistent, with missing articles and awkward phrasing.
  5. It introduces topics like "literal nazis" and "proxy war" without context or explanation of how they relate to the original point about fake online participation.
  6. While there are fragments of potentially valid counterarguments (like questioning the source of online manipulation), they're presented in such a disjointed way that the overall response lacks coherence and fails to engage meaningfully with the original points about sophisticated fake participation in online forums.

Thank you for using coherence-bot, come again.

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
66 points (89.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
87 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS