107
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 23 points 1 week ago

Update: Welp, late today this passed the House overwhelmingly, 409-2. The only two nay vote were from Republicans Thomas Massie and Eric Burlison.

Hey yeah can anyone fucking explain to me why AOC and Rashida Tlaib voted yes on this dogshit?

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago

The worst bills in Congress are usually overwhelmingly supported by both parties.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 25 points 1 week ago

The thing is, AOC herself spoke out against this bill according to this article. And I really, really want her to explain this one, as much as I do not expect that she will.

I don't know how in the world I'm expected to have any faith whatsoever in our governance at any level when even our ostensibly most progressive voices aren't willing to block blatant garbage like this.

[-] jdeath@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

i lost my faith in our governance while deployed in iraq. nothing i've seen since has done anything to restore it. dunno how, but something has to change

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

I agree. My problem now is that people like Tlaib were who I looked to for how things could change, and yet here they are enabling worse instead of fighting for better. I can't square that circle, and it means I'm losing one of the last bastions of hope I had for a better world.

[-] ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

I'm confident leadership whipped the votes hard on this one, probably as a futile show of unity. That's where the blame lies.

It would indeed be nice to see a few democrats resisting attacks on the constitution and such but in the house a small number of voices cannot block legislation like in the senate.

I would also like to hear an explanation from AOC just to understand the politics of not acting as the singular democratic "no" vote here. But I'm not going to hold her to task given the obvious failure of leadership.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago

Because they've always been complicit. They talk a big game when then have no power to change things, but when they have leverage, they throw it all away.

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38633 readers
295 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS