172
submitted 2 days ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What the fuck would a non profit need to pull google level profits for?

Mozilla should have been a gatekeeper for open web standards and made a browser that catered exactly to that. The rest is window-dressing.

What did they do with the Google money, tho? Eye-watering packages for their MBA/Lawyer executives and compromise after compromise with DRM peddlers in the name of "market cap".

Fuck em, and let it be a lesson for other non-profits. FSF doesn't seem to be any worse off for not paying cOmPetiTiVe rAtEs to get some clueless execs to betray the mission to chase trends and funds.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago

I don't see how being a non-profit suddenly makes it cheaper to build a secure, modern and compatible browser. (Although I know lots of people underestimate how much effort that takes. But just consider that already Mozilla's doing it for far less money than Google invests in Chrome, for example.)

[-] qweertz@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

Running a community-centred nonprofit is inherently more efficient resources-wise than paying managers and execs piles upon piles of cash in a for-profit scheme

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 0 points 21 hours ago

That's the kind of thing that sounds nice, but in practice I don't think that's what evidence points towards.

this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
172 points (95.7% liked)

Firefox

19527 readers
71 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS