17

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29035971

Posting here for preservation's sake

Image in removed comment was the attached Palpatine image. Curious to see if the same admin mod would remove these screenshots if I crosspost them to !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com , which they also admin and mod. Would I get a fair trial there or will my dissenting and others’ be silenced?

You can’t say you’re against disinfo if you’re knowing and intentionally promulgating it and abetting its usage. They also didn’t even remove the Reddit watermark.

This is why I don’t assign identities unto myself, because you criticize one action done wrong by leaders of an ideology or movement and bam! you’re shut out of it completely. They’ve lost the aid of an ally and progress is impeded by being shorted a participant trying to correct the course.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago
  1. That's an opinion, not a fact. And while I agree that in many circumstances there are plenty of reactionary responses, it does not get anywhere close to 100%.
  2. Irrelevant to the point.
  3. You're conflating an "anti-AI movement" with just not liking AI.
  4. I never made any claims about banning AI or even fighting against it, really. Not sure why you're ascribing that to me, and it doesn't provide any argument to the main claim that "disliking AI is always from right-wing capitalism".
  5. While I get your overall point here and mostly agree that AI is 'just a tool', the rest of your point is based on banning, which is not part of the discussion. Also, it's a pretty false equivalent argument, but I assume you're not expecting it to be a 1:1 comparison, just trying to make the point that it's just a tool and should not be labeled as inherently bad.
  6. Once again, you're conflating an "anti-AI movement" with just not liking AI. I don't know if there' some big coordinated "anti-AI movement" that makes that argument in particular and I've somehow never heard of it or seen any evidence of, but it seems to me you've created a fake, absurd strawman.
  7. That's great and helps obviate one of my main issues with AI.

In total, you've made zero arguments for the logic that any sentiment of disliking AI should be met with hostility and all comes from a source of “right-wing liberals”. All I see is unfounded attempts of vilifying people who simply disagree with you by shoving a label onto them. Another way to describe this is "bad-jacketing".

I suggest you read about "bad-jacketing". Particularly as a moderator and that it is described in rule 1 of the instance.

I will now disengage because I have ample evidence that you and _cryptagion don't intend on a genuine interaction.

You’re conflating an “anti-AI movement” with just not liking AI.

@Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com is literally an admin, they have access to voter and user metric data that you don't. Who are you to claim there isn't brigading or a movement going on? That's right you don't and can't actually know better than they do. If I didn't know better I might think you were trying to deny this issue due to your part in it.

@DrAwkwArD@lemmy.world You have no post or comment history whatsoever for two years, yet here you are in this thread downvoting comments. Sus...

@Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com This is what I mean when I say there is brigading here, people are using bots or their own alt accounts to vote on accounts

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, thanks for the heads up. I've proposed in !div0_governance@lemmy.dbzer0.com to update the instance rules to disallow anti-genAI trolling in communities where genAI is allowed. They can take their pro-copyright-rentseeking campaign elsewhere. Don't know why they thought it would fly here.

I've got no real problem with folks taking that position tbh, but it's not ok to dogpile posts on our communities like has happened here. I'm also somewhat sympathetic to the argument that GenAI is having an impact on artists' livelihoods. But they haven't connected the dots that this is only an issue because of greedy corporations trying to fuck over artists. They are directing all their anger towards GenAI instead of the real source of the problem. By all means advocate for greedy corporations to stop using AI to increase their profits at the expense of artists. But to come into a leftist space and demand that we stop using AI too is at best tokenistic, and at worst just serves to obfuscate the fundamental problem.

The users engaged in trolling here and tying to excuse it as "activism" should think harder about who they are fighting with and why. Even if we did capitulate and ban genAI, that would have zero impact on artists, because we don't pay for artists in the first place. It's nothing but virtue signalling and tokenism. The Luddites didn't go around breaking into peoples houses and smashing their spinning wheels. They went to factories owned by rich men and companies to destroy machinery in order to disrupt production and fight for workers rights and safety. Good on them too! If the anti genAI brigade were fighting against Getty's (or Adobe, etc.) use of AI that might actually have a useful leftist purpose, and the analogy with the Luddites would work. Instead they are here causing a nuisance in a leftist community, over some random crossposted GenAI meme. Good work guys - job done I guess, the capitalists must be quaking in their boots right now because of your "activism".

I think @shaiatan@midwest.social is probably another one, does have history, but 2 months inactive. Maybe I'm being too aggressive but this Anti-AI brigade is out of control.

Yeah I agree, the Anti AI movement (and it is a movement) is extremely reactionary and doesn't accomplish anything. Certainly isn't helping artists. And yeah they're not even comparable to luddites who went after factories back in the day. Anti-AI trolls are going after individual people, often harassing people, also deciding to use any arguments even ones proven to be lies or faulty. They're inadvertently helping big corporations by making themselves and their movement look like quacks or trolls.

Yeah, thanks for the heads up. I’ve proposed in !div0_governance@lemmy.dbzer0.com to update the instance rules to disallow anti-genAI trolling in communities where genAI is allowed. They can take their pro-copyright-rentseeking campaign elsewhere. Don’t know why they thought it would fly here.

Did you post it yet? I didn't see it there.

[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Blatantly ignoring disengage while also making absolutely unfounded and ridiculous claims. Absolutely shameful.

You think admins are infallible? You're only attacking me with these claims because I'm calling out someone who happens to be an admin. They are still human and, clearly, capable of doing wrong.

The whole point of this conversation is that it is wrong to assume everyone who simply shows a dislike in AI is a 'right-wing pro-capitalist liberal'. That is a judgement of a person's ideals and values based on a single metric that has no inherent connection to right-wing liberalism.

Now you have convinced me to block this entire instance because of this abhorrent behavior.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

Blatantly ignoring disengage while also making absolutely unfounded and ridiculous claims. Absolutely shameful.

You are attempting to abuse the disengage rule. If you want to disengage, you're not supposed to also try to put the last word in. Just disengage without arguing further.

Now you have convinced me to block this entire instance because of this abhorrent behavior.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out, troll.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 hours ago

it's another user entirely. they didn't ignore disengage, they are commenting on it

[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Right. I misunderstood thinking that it meant that all people must respect the person's desire to be left out of it. It would probably be a better rule if that were the case. But, apparently rules don't really matter here anyways.

I also missed an important part of it:

For a disengage call to be valid, it must not be accompanied by other arguments on the existing topic. A disengage is not meant to be a trump card to have the last word.

It still doesn't excuse the disgusting behavior.

I simply wanted to be done, because there is zero respect shown here.

I'm also now frustrated that the instance block appears to not be working, since I got a notification for this reply.

I don't want to deal with any interactions with anything or anyone related to db0 after this appalling lack of any respect, utterly shameful accusations, and weird cult-like attitude towards an admin.

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 minutes ago

Since you obviously have no intention of actually disengaging, there's no problem with me pointing out that the disgusting behavior here is you intruding upon our instance to push your own shitty agenda, while insisting we abide by your dumbass rules about civility so we don't hurt your fweelings. This is the problem with you self-righteous .world liberal hacks, you think the entire fediverse is your own little kingdom to do whatever you wish in, but can't handle your cult-like world views being challenged.

Absolutely disgusting, and since you won't be seeing our communities anymore, I say good riddance, and absolutely nothing of any value whatsoever was lost by not having you around.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 hours ago

an instance block will stop db0 content from showing in your feed.. comments will still populate and users can still comment back to you.

this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
17 points (63.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
130 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS