170
submitted 2 days ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

comments claiming mozilla doesn't need the money make me feel i'm crazy. you actually think making a modern web engine that competes with chrome in terms of performance and compatibility is easy? that relying solely on donations from individuals and voluntary work are gonna cut it? if it was that easy, we'd have more than just gecko, webkit and webkit fork -- but we don't.

it also truly drives me insane when people bring up the forks, as if they're anything more than re-skins.

without financial backing, mozilla is dead, firefox is dead, and the web will be 100% google's. no project as large and complex as firefox stays afloat without corporate-level money.

[-] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

No but maybe the C-level guys don't need multiple millions while the actual developers don't hardly get paid in comparison.

[-] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br -1 points 14 hours ago

i might be mistaken, but mozilla's executives get paid about 15% of the total revenue. it's a lot, but it's not the problem here

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

15% of their revenue just for the fucking CEO (a string of really bad ones at that) is a huge fucking problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
170 points (95.7% liked)

Firefox

19527 readers
344 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS