6
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
6 points (87.5% liked)
Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.
12522 readers
1 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules
- No harassment
- crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
- Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
- No spamming.
- Stay friendly.
- Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
- Tag your post. (Read under)
Important
Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!
- Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate.
Cross-posting
- !everything_git@lemmy.ml is allowed!
- !docker@lemmy.ml is allowed!
- !portainer@lemmy.ml is allowed!
- !fediverse@lemmy.ml is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
- !selfhosted@lemmy.ml is allowed!
If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I doubt this part.
I think as soon as the NAS is working, the others (including prox) should use it, and no additional complications.
It's probable that I'm missing something but I couldn't get the share to be available to any other VM or LXC on ProxMox until I passed the pool from TrueNAS back to ProxMox.
I'm all for getting rid of the TrueNAS VM as long as I can reassemble the zfspool in ProxMox without losing the data (though if I did, no big deal). And I'd also like a user friendly way of monitoring the health of my disks.
zfs itself can do that. The zpool members know the pool and the other members.
So I don't need to take care to re-mount them in the right configuration? I'll do some googling but I wasn't sure if I needed to do some backup preparation of something.