1096
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Isn't capitalism the opposite ?

Competition and open market would promote sellers who quote lower because of abundance and consumers as well as sellers would benefit from the abundance.

Sellers who try to restrict the supply ultimately would loose in the long run because in a competitive market the seller would always choose cheap prices.

roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price This would be valid if no one wan't to be sellers and a all the sellers in a market cooperate together to do this or are required by law to do this.

I know we like to blame capitalism for a lot of things but this here is a different situation i think.

[-] Phoonzang@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It would in a properly free market. But late stage capitalism's goal is monopolization, because it maximises profit. Or to quote Marx: "Monopoly is the inevitable end of competition, which engenders it by a continual negation of itself."

And this is exactly what Steinbeck is describing here: "you buy food from us, at our prices, or nothing at all. We'd rather destroy our product than to sell lower." And they can do this because no one has access to the products, or the means of production (e. g. the land to grow produce).

And this is where we are today with Amazon, Nestle, Walmart and so on. They don't have any real competition anymore.

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
1096 points (95.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

10652 readers
303 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS