-108
A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment
(andymasley.substack.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
-108 points (13.0% liked)
Technology
72585 readers
2060 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?
What if power consumption is not so much limited by the software's appetite, but rather by the hardware's capabilities?
You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them
I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you're actually interested
What weighs more: the cost of taking people at their word, or the effort it takes to interpret the subtext of every interaction?