226
submitted 11 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It’s a nanny state. Sure, candy and soda is bad for you, and america has an obesity problem, but I’m against this.

Just give people money and let them buy what they want / need.

I’m tired of pedophiles and gay homophobes shaming poor people for having a soda and a candy bar. (Edit: not my intention to associate lgbtq with pedophiles, but it seems a lot of homophobes are into it. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with being gay, but republifuckers need to mind their own business in general and stop judging others for the behaviors they are ashamed to participate in themselves.)

[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Alright, how about alcohol and cigarettes?

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just give them money, I don’t care if they want hookers and blow

It’s none of your business what poor people spend their money on.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Weird way to come around to UBI, but I'm with it

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

lol… I’m just tired of people trying to gate keep basic needs as though they somehow know better than poor people what they need.

If we checked what government subsidized millionaires and billionaires spent their money 10% as much as how we do poor people we could actually save money…..

Food stamps and wic and other programs are generally less than a couple hundred dollars. It’s not your business what they spend it on.

[-] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Then they spend their money on hookers and blow, and then come back saying they have no money to buy food. Do you let them starve then?

[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

Alright, fair enough

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

It’s a nanny state.

I mean yea, but so is giving you money for food. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that the food you get with it to be nutritious.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

Eat your own nutritious food. Stop sniffing poor people ass, mind your own business

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

When the money for it stops coming out of my check, I'll stop having an opinion on it.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

Are you worried about corporate welfare recipients as well, or do you just like the smell of poor people farts?

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

I hate corporate welfare far more than paying for junk food but I don't like either one.

[-] blarghly@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I am opposed to corporate welfare and paying for someone else's Little Debbie habit.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

At a minimum they should talk about how they will move to providing healthy foods as they cut the bad stuff. Moving to unhealthy food to none, seems like a bad move. Like wtf

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
226 points (98.7% liked)

News

37266 readers
780 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS