-108
A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment
(andymasley.substack.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
-108 points (13.0% liked)
Technology
73419 readers
910 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They're specifically showing you that in the use case you asked about the assertions must change. Your question is bad for the case that you're specifically asking about.
So no, it doesn't answer the question... But your question has a bunch more caveats that must be accounted for that you're just straight up missing.
No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you're just sloppily babbling talking points
If the premise of your argument is fundamentally flawed, then you're not having a reasoned debate. You just a zealot.
Please articulate why the premise of my argument is fundamentally flawed