81
submitted 2 days ago by PlasticLove@lemmy.today to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lemmynated@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago

I don’t get this?

Sure the other failure mentioned in the article sounds serious, but not disclosing you had a Grindr account years ago? How is that at all important?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Well, the article didn’t publish the pictures so we can’t really tell. But in general, “pictures of a sexual nature” is not something you want your security chief to have ‘out there’ such that they could be compromised.

Like a pee tape, for example.

[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

If he doesn't give a flying fuck about it, there isn't any option for blackmail.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Well, that’s certainly one way to look at it.

[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

I guess he didn't disclose it in a security review, so he failed to execute the "fly your freak flag high" part.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
81 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1094 readers
451 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS