208
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by xkcdbot@lemmy.world to c/xkcd@lemmy.world

Title text:

Unstoppable force-carrying particles can't interact with immovable matter by definition.

Transcript:

[An arrow pointing to the right and a trapezoid are labeled as 'Unstoppable Force' and 'Immovable Object' respectively.]
[The arrow is shown as entering the trapezoid from the left and the part of it in said trapezoid is coloured gray.]
[The arrow is shown as leaving the trapezoid to the right and is coloured black.]
[Caption below the panel:] I don't see why people find this scenario to be tricky.

Source: https://xkcd.com/3084/

explainxkcd for #3084

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Facepalm Man i'm dumb, this is a great answer to that thought experiment.

[-] Piafraus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Force is not a thing that moves. Force is what is applied to an object. In this "answer" whatever is shown and depicted as force is not force.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Then reverse the assumptions. Maybe it’s the immovable object that can’t be interacted with. Apply all the force you want and meet nothibg

[-] Piafraus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If you applied the unstoppable force and the object of application did not move - then this force was not unstoppable

[-] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Eh, it's just redefining the assumed meaning. "Intangible" does mean "unstoppable" in a way, but that's not really what's intended.

this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
208 points (98.6% liked)

xkcd

11495 readers
216 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS