We're all bald under our hair.
EA: It's in the grave!
(Hopefully)
Journalists really milking that headline.
Fwiw, USSS has declared the highest level of security for that day already.
Why doubt? The party has made it part of their platform to distrust the voting process. It sounds like a threat because it is one.
it is also somewhat misleading
...what? No it isn't. Restricting the premise from infinite to any finite amount of time completely negates it. That doesn't prove it's "misleading", it proves anyone that thinks it does has no idea what they're talking about.
Ah yes - Bird-Swine flu. That sounds about right for this decade.
What are we supposed to do[...]?
All of these articles treat energy usage like a massive crime, but miss/ignore that the world's energy use needs to go up as we increasingly turn to electric alternatives. The problem truly lies in how we generate electricity, not how we use it.
So the actual answer to your question is intense and rapid investment in sustainable, non-carbon energy production. An infrastructure revamp to rival any other in history. It would've been far better to do so decades ago, but that's no longer an option. Anything else is just half measures we can't afford.
They aren't talking about firing them from a job.
Meme? That's literally just an ad. Am I missing something?
...Narcan?
*Actually decided to click through to the article for this one.
Since 2020, Griswold has made available at least $5 million in grant money for more physical security at election sites, which has allowed counties to take measures such as installing bulletproof glass or having Narcan on hand in case fentanyl is deployed as a chemical weapon.
I know fentanyl is the big scary drug of the decade but...is that something that happens? That sounds insane.
No one is saying studies should stop. Popping up and suggesting otherwise as if this nutjob has a point is just helping prop them up.