1047
submitted 2 years ago by Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't actually think. I just know I'm right. Then whenever I'm in an argument I can just link the [word we're arguing about] wikipedia article. Since I'm right and wikipedia has objective information the argument is over every time and I win.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago

Did you have something useful to add to the conversation?

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The conversation was you linking a Wikipedia article, I was at least hoping you'd link like a book or something. Like we could have a discussion if you were trying to argue against authoritarianiam as defined by say Bakunin or some other anarchist thinker.

Then I could respond with On Authority which argues that authority is a natural consequence of any organization and calling something authoritarian just means you're saying that it's a system that is able to successfully reproduce itself.

You could also try to link "authoritarianism" to fascism, but again that is pointless because there's already a term for fascism, which is Fascism.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1047 points (81.1% liked)

Memes

51417 readers
507 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS