Are people blind on PeerTube? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by SolarPunker@slrpnk.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I read many comments on how PeerTube isn't sustainable as a YouTube alternative and, while it's certainly true right now, are we sure it will be the same in the near future?

The platform is growing and the new mobile app is making great progress; I can certainly see some people investing in a major instance some day, accelerating the platform adoption.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Suoko@feddit.it 2 points 3 months ago

Disk space is quite cheap and I'm sure high quality vids could take a very small space if NPU processed and upscaled.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 3 months ago

Hell, using consumer grade, free tools (handbrake) I can convert a DVD to mkv and reduce the file size upwards of 75%, and still be perfectly viewable on a current 65" TV.

I can only imagine the capabilities of Google/YouTube. It would be fascinating to see a high level diagram of how they handle a video.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Disk space is relatively cheap, until you also count redundancy, backups, storage hardware, utilities, and bandwidth.

[-] Suoko@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

Redundancy and backup is automatically provided thanks to federation, other instances can decide to host a copy of your vid (see archive.com for example).

Bandwidth is provided by torrent.

Storage HW can be anything.

Ads are supported so you can monetize