200

Why don't communist movements focus on creating and nurturing employee owned businesses? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Yondoza@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

154 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The overarching goal of communism is for laborers to own the means of production instead of an owning/capitalist class. Employee owned businesses are the realization of communism within a capitalist society.

It seems to me that most communist organizations in capitalist societies focus on reform through government policies. I have not heard of organizations focusing on making this change by leveraging the capitalist framework. Working to create many employee owned businesses would be a tangible way to achieve this on a small but growing scale. If successful employee owned businesses are formed and accumulate capital they should be able to perpetuate employee ownership through direct acquisition or providing venture capital with employee ownership requirements.

So my main questions are:

Are organizations focusing on this and I just don't know about it?
If not, what obstacles are there that would hinder this approach to increasing the share labor collective ownership?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

I don't agree with this. Shareholders extracting value from a company is arguably more of an 'inefficency' than treating employees fairly. Well treated employees provide a benefit to the company while shareholders purely remove resources.

I have no data to back up my claim, just logic, so I could very well be wrong.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Shareholders extracting value from a company is arguably more of an ‘inefficency’ than treating employees fairly.

Their pals also owns all media and all economists so they will outright lie to everyone about it. Capitalism at this point in development when even capitalist themselves gets alienated from their own capital loses every advantage and usefulness for developing the productive forces.

[-] ladicius@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You got a point there, and there may be a lot of data to prove that point.

I am part of a housing cooperative ("Wohnungsgenossenschaft" in German), and these cooperatives are noticeably cheaper because they are owned by the members/renters and don't have to generate any profit, just enough excess money to build new homes. The principle is very convincing if you live in it and save loads of money every month. The cooperatives employees aren't overworking themselves, too.

[-] joshchandra@midwest.social 2 points 22 hours ago

Awesome! Where can I read further about this endeavor?

this post was submitted on 17 May 2025

200 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

48083 readers

862 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS