100
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
100 points (98.1% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8023 readers
307 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The problem is that California is a destination for many homeless and it strains the system. As a state, CA cannot control who comes and goes and so can only control migration through deterrence.
The red states in the region are about to pull back on funding resources for the homeless and creating new homeless with the disaster economic policy. A massive pile-up of homeless in CA would not be a good outcome for anyone. State resources would be strained to breaking and without Federal assistance or an ability to control migration... That's a big yikes.
And moving the homeless every 72 hours does what to fix these problems?
It does nothing. He should do what all the other states without a homelessness problem are doing.
What do those states do, coward? Lock people up for poverty?
They are clearly doing something that works better for the average person given the emigration rate. California won't be able to keep these 'programs' going if their disatisfied tax base continues the already decade long exodus for greener pastures. California is disgusting and dangerous. People don't like public defecation, open drug use, theft and violent crime. "The people" have spoken and are moving to Texas, Florida, Arizona, Nevada etc
What do you want to happen to the homeless people, then? If the thing the other states are doing is pushing homeless people to California, and you want California to push them elsewhere, where do they end up?
So no specifics? Just assuming they must be doing something
Cope
What are those states doing?
I'm gonna guess "one way bus ticket to California "