“Attacking the source” is usually valid. If someone posted a link to an article on chudnews.com that said Biden eats babies, I’m sure you wouldn’t take that at face value.

That's 60 citations, not sources, there are 11 sources in that article. If one out of those 11 is that bad, then the article is trash. It has 22 references from an AI slop site with a very familiar traditional 'slavic' symbol yeah, I have no interest in reading that garbage, and neither do you. You just found a Wikipedia article with a title that sounded good for your argument. Where do you think you are? On Reddit? Go fuck yourself. Ad hominem my balls.