806
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 38 points 1 year ago

I'm still trying to figure out why they don't already use trackers. RFID tags are dirt cheap and it's 20 years old technology. They already have a process where they add barcode stickers at checkin, slap some RFID in there too.

[-] roboticide@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

They certainly can and do use a tracking system.

I get notifications from Delta every time my bag moves once it's checked in - loaded, unloaded, what pickup.

There's nothing really wrong with barcodes. NFC/RFID would be a logical upgrade though, and just has to integrate into the existing system.

[-] 1luv8008135@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Still an additional cost they’d rather avoid.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Surprised they don’t offer it as a $20 up charge…

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

You have to change a lot of equipment to make it useful. Most major airports have very complicated machinery that uses the barcodes, which feeds into the baggage handlers. I don't know how they fix that machinery to make BLE worth it.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They don't have to convert their entire luggage handling setup to RFID, just use it to augment their lost luggage detection.

Add RFID readers at strategic points and feed their data into a computer, which in turn feeds it to a replicated database. When a piece of luggage is lost look in that database to see where's the last RFID blip. Also very easy to let the customer see their luggage positions on a website.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I think you mean BLE. As far as I understand it, RFID doesn't have any particular advantage over barcodes for tracking luggage.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago

Barcodes need line of sight with scanners and close range. RFID detectors can sense tags at larger distances and just based on general proximity.

BLE is also an option, comparison to RFID would depend on setup particularities. RFID would be the more natural choice for throwaway, recyclable stickers that just need to store a short "dumb" ID.

[-] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

RFID is easier to read, so you could set up scanners at more places. Also easier to walk around looking for a bag and know that it's somewhere in this pile.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
806 points (98.1% liked)

Apple

17525 readers
42 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS