93

100K for Eastman so far, no word yet on Trump or the others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

100K for Eastman so far, no word yet on Trump or the others.

Low enough to keep Trump out of a cell without breaking a sweat.

Fucking rich people...

[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not trying to minimize the unfairness of this, but... bond is intended to ensure that a person sticks around until trial. This is all pretrial, so the precedent is that it should not be punishment, it should be insurance.

If they ever lose track of Trump, they can just check Faux News. If he skips bail, they can just pull up that Truth Social and look at what he's posting. He can't run away and disappear, because it's impossible for him.

Illinois has even gotten rid of cash bail entirely, because in this day an age, you can't hide without leaving society. Either you are so dangerous that they need to keep you locked up until trial, or you aren't and shouldn't be punished until it's proven beyond a reasonable doubt that you did the thing.

We shouldn't be complaining that we're not punishing them early, we should be pushing for the same treatment to the rest (like is slowly happening now.)

https://www.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/the-illinois-supreme-court-cash-bail-ruling-explained

[-] knotthatone@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Georgia law also requires that the accused "Poses no significant risk of intimidating witnesses or otherwise obstructing the administration of justice."

I'm really interested in how they're going to address that one given Trump's history of intimidating witnesses, juries and obstructing the administration of justice..

[-] Fidelity9373@artemis.camp 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd be happy if they just forbid him from using electronics. That said, that didn't work so great for Andrew Tate...

Edit: on second thought, maybe not. He's been caught so far because he DID use them and got recorded.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
93 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2011 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS