485
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by wjrii@lemmy.world to c/desire_paths@sh.itjust.works

… especially if the neighborhood is filled with little shits with too many electrified toys.

EDIT: Okay, I'm convinced. Regular bikes would actually be a sensible cause here. Let me be a curmudgeon though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That, plus if there are any pedestrians using the path, they should get first dibs. Bicycles can ride on grass just fine, but anyone with a walker, a wheelchair, a stroller, or just wants to keep their shoes clean, should not feel like they have to squeeze or get off the pavement to let a bicyclist pass.

Here, the convenient option for bikes is also the most friendly option. Ornamental grass shouldn't even be a top-10 concern. If the municipality won't build proper infra for all users, then desire paths are all but guaranteed.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
485 points (97.5% liked)

Desire Paths

2321 readers
21 users here now

Desire paths Desire paths can be paths created as a consequence of erosion caused by human or animal foot-fall or traffic. The paths usually represent the shortest or most easily navigated routes between origins and destinations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desire_path

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS