[Fixed] "following packages have been kept back" Error in Ubuntu (itsfoss.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by ozoned@piefed.social to c/linux@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm on Debian 12. I did an upgrade today and got a message that pipewire-audio had been kept back. A few weeks ago I did a:

sudo apt install -t bookworm-backports pipewire

Which pulled in the newer version of pipewire so I could resolve an issue.

So I searched for 'apt kept back' and found the above article. I wanted to share it for anyone else in the future hitting something like this.

My solution is just to do nothing. Debian 13 should only be a few months away at this point and when I attempt to run an update only for pipewire-audio it indicates that I need to update wireplumber. I don't really want to go down the dependency hole at this time, so just going to let it chill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah the whole reason for packages being kept back is because they are rolling them out slowly to ensure that no major bugs affect the great majority of users of those packages.

You wouldn't want your whole Ubuntu or Debian user base getting stuck with the same problem and having to roll back all at the same time. availa roll out certain packages slowly so only a small portion have to do it, and also save your reputation, and finally give the package maintainers to fix the problem.

[-] ozoned@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks! I was wondering why that was. I looked at pipewire and it had been updated. That's smart. Very happy to be on a stable base of Debian.

[-] who@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah the whole reason for packages being kept back is because they are rolling them out slowly

That's an Ubuntu extension to APT. I don't think Debian adopted it, and even if they had, this particular "kept back" message probably comes from a different mechanism.

EDIT: OP is trying to install a backport of a package with a version-specific dependency; I'll address that situation in a top-level comment.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

I dunno. Sounds like a repo-specific thing. OP is on Debian 12 and what I'm understanding is they're also seeing this message for a third party repo.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2025

17 points (94.7% liked)

Linux

11110 readers

14 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
No NSFW adult content
Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world