66

They were bought by IBM a few years back, but even aside from that they’re a corporation and they care about making money above all else.

It looks like Red Hat is doing its damnedest to consolidate as much power for themselves within the Linux ecosystem.

I don’t think the incessant Fedora shilling is unrelated.

It seems like there isn’t much criticism of the company or their tactics, and I’m curious if any of you think that should change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 21 points 3 days ago

I'm all for Linux distributions run and owned by the community. With those we don't have to be afreaid of weird business decisions. Debian is a good example, and very democratic. But I believe several other distros are maintained by a community as well, including Arch, NixOS...

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fedora is also community operated. Although there's a bit of an informal understanding between RedHat and Fedora to work together.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I didn't know that. Wikipedia says it's only 35% of contributors who are employed by RedHat. But isn't governance split equally between the community and RedHat? So it's not entirely independent, but more a mix?!

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
66 points (83.7% liked)

Linux

7753 readers
487 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS