155
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] engelsaxons@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

Also gonna hit him on the semantic part here because why not but I remember seeing a documentary a long time ago about a rural village in an impoverished nation where girls were constantly developing incontinence issues and other long-term injuries because they were often giving birth at 14-15 and some anglo documentarian was saying how even waiting until they were 16 would have greatly reduced these rates because their bodies were too small and undeveloped (yikes ). So no Peter, 14-17 is not fucking "developed sexually" doomer

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
155 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13875 readers
834 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS