79
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] refalo@programming.dev 12 points 6 days ago

macOS 26? I thought the last version was 15...

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Looks like they're jumping from 15 to 26, in fact they're doing the same thing for iOS, jumping from 18 to 26 for the next release. Looks like they're synchronizing all their OS version numbers using the year they'll be primarily used(i.e. 2026) from what I can find.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is my preferred versioning format for user-facing software, by far.

I feel like Semver should also adopt the date inclusion, like 7.4.2-202606 or even 7.4.202606 — you can even extended it to multiple daily releases like 7.4.20260610.1233

There's too much software to mentally track when each version was released. You should be able to tell at a glance.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

I'm not an apple person, so even I saw news about iOS I thought "how the fuck are they on 26 already?"

I didn't really care, but I appreciate the explanation.

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Tbh I'm not an apple person either. The comment about macOS being on 26 caught my eye and I went and did some research.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago

They're basically copying Samsung (and the auto industry) and switching to using the year of the release instead of iterative naming schemes.

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
79 points (93.4% liked)

Linux

7897 readers
532 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS