-5

https://feddit.org/post/13994826/7165181

Everything I downvoted was because I genuinely do not think it's good. Like meat is not going to cure cancer.

I actually really like eating meat I just try to life a life that gives others room to enjoy this earth too without mutually destroying it.

Please tell me how I am the asshole :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 day ago

But if there's a community spreading harmful disinformation and it pops up in my all, I should give it an upvote for the effort or what?

I see a lot of these communities browsing by all lately and when I downvote the posts I see (which are literal harmful disinformation) I get banned for downvoting.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If you profoundly disagree with any community views, I suggest you block and move on. Going there and downvoting everything is a dick move.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

In this case, it's not a profound disagreement with the community's purpose (carnivore diet). I find the concept interesting.

But if I see some horrendous thing from that community (Youtuber saying eating meat cures cancer) in my All feed and downvote it, then apparently I'm being a dick and deserve to be banned immediately?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That video was one ladies personal testimonial and she didn't just do carnivore, she also incorporated prolonged fasts intermixed with carnivore refeeding. Her single experience was that her inoperable tumor went into remission. That isn't the same thing as "carnivore cures cancer."

The interesting cancer research going on with glioblastomas is with a ketogenic protocol (not specifically carnivore) - a press (keto), and pulse (glucose and glutamine suppression) protocol - which has demonstrated some promising early data. Taking advantage of the warburg effect (i.e. cancer only metabolizes glucose and glutamine).

Now going back to the testimonial lady, she didn't following a observed protocol, she wasn't using a press/pulse protocol. She just kinda stumbled around and for some reason her inoperable tumor went away. It's interesting, but hardly anything to hang your hat on. However, the value of the underlying testimonial is still there - if nothing else is working for your specific situation you can try carnivore - it couldn't hurt.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No but if your ONLY interference with this community (or any community) is to downvote, you have no interest being there.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 day ago

Actively combatting harmful medical misinformation is not a "dick move", they deserve every downvote and worse

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Then combat it with links?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The problem is - what you consider harmful misinformation I consider foundational nutrition. How can we reconcile our different perspectives?

I see a few options

  1. We ignore each other, bygones and the like
  2. We have a productive chat trying to improve our mutual understanding of the world
  3. Or we can go around calling everything we disagree with disinformation (fake news heh), and paint the world in negativity

I prefer 2, but I'm happy with 1 - I find 3 boring and not a good use of my time.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

If you truly prefer 2 then you wouldn't automatically ban people for downvoting posts in your communities. Downvoting things on my way past in my All feed is not an act of disrespect to your whole worldview.

[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 1 points 22 hours ago

Rather - you downvoted every post and comment in the community so its not a good fit

You don't downvote comments from All, do you? Wouldn't that require you to go into the post and actively downvote them one by one?

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz -1 points 21 hours ago

I don't know what you're quoting here because I dont think that was at me.

I was pretty sure I downvoted like 3 posts and a couple of comments in those, but then upvoted another one and some comments in that thread. However, looking back at the comm, my UI shows I have only downvoted one post and no comments, so I must have actually been banned after downvoting literally 1 post. I only realised I was banned when I tried to comment on a post, so was still trying to participate without even realizing I couldn't.

You can upvote/downvote direcrly from All, but I think its pretty normal behaviour to click on it from there and then upvote/downvote. Downvoting literally every comment would be a lot more work and is a pretty dumb move.

[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 1 points 21 hours ago

If you truly prefer 2 then you wouldn't automatically ban people for downvoting posts in your communities.

I'm quoting the mod's comment to OP from the image on this post in reference to your quote above.

Downvoting literally every comment would be a lot more work and is a pretty dumb move.

Yet that's exactly what OP is stated to have done by the mod.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago

Right, so you ignored entirely what this tangent is about.

The mod has stated they have automatic tooling for banning people who downvote on their communities and personally I was banned after one downvote. That cuts off any opposed discussion at a very early juncture.

Not to mention this ban extends to all communities they moderate, so the OP reason "community mismatch" in Carnivore also gets you banned from a bunch of other communities that aren't related to diet at all.

I mean, you can do whatever you want in the community you create, but by definition, all of the above is power trippin'.

[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 1 points 7 hours ago

The mod has stated they have automatic tooling for banning people who downvote on their communities and personally I was banned after one downvote.

Did you contact the mod directly? They've also said they're happy to unban but you'd have to behave like an adult instead of throwing a tantrum.

It's really not power tripping unless they directly refuse to engage and remove the ban after you've attempted to resolve it civilly. Mods often use tools to manage their responsibilities and tools can make mistakes, as can mods.

I mean, you can do whatever you want in the community you create

As long as it aligns with what you believe, otherwise it's power tripping.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Carnivore also gets you banned from a bunch of other communities that aren’t related to diet at all.

Yeah, this is intentional, if I as a human have to review someone's behavior and approve a community ban then I don't want to have to do it for each of my communities one after another. It's a broad heuristic. I probably should improve the tooling to only do the ban by a group of communities rather then all I moderate.

As you can imagine in the past removing someone from a single community causes them to go to my other communities and throw negativity around.

Ideally each community would have a moderator account so they arn't obviously linked - that is a optimization for the future.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
-5 points (46.7% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
530 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS