1034
submitted 1 day ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/til@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 7 points 6 hours ago

Than the people you criticized. They got off their asses and touched grass for a few hours, met other likeminded individuals, networked, got to know allies in their communities. What are you doing, Comrade? Other than rereading the Communist Manifesto for the zillionth time? Where's your praxis?

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That’s what I wanted to confirm. If that’s the bar we’re setting for accomplishments, my group’s blowing them out of the water.

Funny attempt though. I’m not sure how you expected the argument to go your way, when your own standards for accomplishment set a bar so low that almost every single person minimally involved in any activism is doing loads more than this bare minimum measure.

Considering the “no kings” folks were sponsored by the Walton family and purposely enforced a stance of silence on the Gaza genocide, this doesn’t even meet the threshold for bare minimum on human decency.

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Your conspiracism is silly but otherwise you're correct

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago
[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

“Conspiracy” implies something hidden. The financial backers of this event were listed in plain English on their ads.

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago
[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yes, they seem to be attempting to avoid a MAGA boycott by saying this is a personal choice by the Walton heiress, which just coincidentally aligns with Walmart’s pushback attempts against cuts to social benefit programs that’s expected to impact their profits.

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

So YOUR ASSERTION is that all the ads say "No Kings Day, brought to you by WalMart!" but they're offended by ONE ad (in a publication that MAGA hates and would never pay to see) and that might possibly cost them the MAGA patronage?

Explain this. In detail. Fully.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

I don’t know how to explain this in a way you’ll understand it. I don’t have any training in teaching the mentally challenged.

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

OR....

It is a contradiction that makes no fucking sense

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Are struggling with bipolar or some other personality disorder? It’s one thing to not understand something. It’s quite another to be aggressively confused. This is not healthy.

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago
[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago
[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

Apparently it does not, in the context that you claim.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Prove it. Show me one of their ads for the event where you’re not seeing the sponsors listed.

[-] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

Cool, then Sieg Heil to you, mein guter Herr. Enjoy your moral superiority when ICE kicks in your door.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yes, if you oppose ICE but not the genocide, I am morally superior to you. That is a factual statement.

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
1034 points (99.2% liked)

Today I Learned (TIL)

7651 readers
1109 users here now

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.

Share your knowledge and experience!

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS