1170
submitted 2 days ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/til@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] newfie@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

What I said would be true of Russia. This is because Russia is an oligarchy and this is how oligarchies operate.

The United States is an oligarchy as well.

Therefore what I said applies to the United States.

The goal of law enforcement is to preserve the existing social structure. American social structure is that of oligarchy. Therefore law enforcement exists to preserve oligarchy.

American law enforcement is immensely well funded. These protests did not all encounter law enforcement opposition. Therefore, law enforcement must have determined that these protests did not represent a threat to oligarchy. Therefore the protests were toothless because they did not represent a threat to the existing social structure

[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social -1 points 23 hours ago

Ah, now I understand your "logic". I didn't pay attention to the instance you are from at first.

[-] newfie@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 hours ago

Isn't this just admission to stereotyping which is inherently illogical?

The US is an oligarchy. Any actual threat to that would be suppressed. Because these protests were not suppressed, what conclusion can be drawn?

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
1170 points (99.2% liked)

Today I Learned (TIL)

7651 readers
588 users here now

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.

Share your knowledge and experience!

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS