34
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by hddsx@lemmy.ca to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

I really don't like the design of the progress pride flag, and I couldn't really put my finger on it until I saw this: https://nava.org/good-flag-bad-flag

For reference, here is the flag I'm referencing as "bad flag":

And here is the original:

So, the original has too many colors, but it's the colors of the rainbow. In order. It's recognizable from really far away, and it's dead simple to draw.

With the Intersex flag, that's 14 colors. There are three shades of "purple". The circle won't be visible from far away. The chevrons are too thin to be very recognizable from far away.

It's not like there aren't good pride flags. Like there are AMAZING ones:

Edit:

In case you don't know what these are: https://flagsforgood.com/collections/pride-flags

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Yermaw@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thats way too busy. Should definitely just keep the rainbow flag. Not every little niche needs specific representation, just have the rainbow as a catchall for any kind of deviation from heterosex

Edit to add : if they want to use them to identify and specify within rallies or amongst themselves somehow then whatever, go for it, as long as we can accept the layman isnt gonna have a clue and cant really be expected to.

[-] Railison@aussie.zone 20 points 1 week ago

I thought the rainbow was supposed to mean it encompassed everyone.

The colours on the flag apparently weren’t sufficiently inclusive so perhaps this should be the next flag:

[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

this fails to capture the grades of saturation.

Here is every color in the RGB (#000000-#FFFFFF) color space arranged sequentially on a Hilbert curve (but scaled down to 512x512)

[-] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago
[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

there are a lot of pieces that use one pixel per color too! you might really dig what people can do with it: it's honestly astonishing the kinds of arrangements they can make just by mixing the colors.

https://allrgb.com/

[-] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago
[-] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I would absolutely and unironically fly this flag, although to be even more inclusive it also needs an alpha layer. Perhaps it should be a cube? Actually even that might not be inclusive enough, we need more dimensions. BRB I need to figure out how to attach a tesseract to my flagpole, I guess I'll need some kind of gordian knot?

[-] DokPsy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was thinking more adding from outside the visible spectrum. So a flag with the entire electromagnetic spectrum from ~10^-20 m to ~10^17 m

[-] nomecks@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 week ago

You need a hyperpole

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

But if you include alphas , you need to be inclusive of betas and sigmas, and other Greek letters still undefined

[-] Asetru@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Black and white are pretty overrepresented there though. Turning this into a sphere might help?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

I call Lime Green as my personal inclusion color!!!!

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

But that doesn't include infrared or ultraviolet 🤣

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

I literally lol'd!

[-] mienshao@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago

God this website is just like reddit. Dumbasses just saying shit. No, the original Pride flag had 8 colors, and each color had a specific meaning. It wasn’t just “to encompass everyone.” Like what the hell, lemmy? Why are we doing bogus discourse on here too? Every year I gotta deal with a bunch of fucking straights dumping on the Progress Pride flag—seriously go fuck yourselves.

[-] Railison@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

dw I am extremely gay

Each color had a specific meaning, but none of those meanings were a specific gender or sexuality. The meanings were intentionally tied to concepts, rather than to distinct groups of people. This was so it could encompass everyone. But then dumbasses started trying to claim specific colors as their own, which excluded people. And so then every group suddenly started making their own flags, since they were being excluded by the people claiming one of the colors on the rainbow.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Wasn't the entire idea of the rainbow flag to just say "this includes everyone", to be inclusive?

Then people started "well red is this, yellow is that, green is that ...." Making the entire thing as exclusive as can be, now requiring a color and or symbol for each and every tiny different identity they were trying to be

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 6 points 1 week ago

Imo, the rainbow flag is perfectly inclusive. By focusing on one minority, you make it less diverse and less inclusive.

Rainbow flag is best

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They all sprung up in that period where flags were trendy. Every little camp had to have one to feel like a singled-out tribe—and, no, this isn't just kink flags. This meant many would be flag designers overnight.

The result is there's some really fugly designs out there in the wild now and the idiots can't go back. But most people are over flag phase now, so you're unlikely to ever see this and most others out in the wild.

Nothing fails more at its job than a pride flag that people have no idea what is. It's almost irony.

And is this one ugly? Oh, yes. Enough to turn a person straight.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The solution is inheritance. If you want a more specific flag, inherit from the rainbow, but add an insignia. Now you have a unifying flag that is more meaningful. Also you can skip the complexity of trying to make everyone stand out because the rainbow is all inclusive.

For example, I also like the pink triangle pirate flag. If you want a gay flag, take the rainbow and add that pirate insignia. Think like the US flag which is also a bunch of stripes but with some star insignia. Now you have one clear insignia on a field of inclusiveness

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Here's the thing though, I know this is an ally flag, but it's like they never considered symbols:

Ignore the really bad black and white background for a second.

Imagine the left side of the shape is an homage to the original pride flag and the right side is WHATEVER YOU WANT TO PUT IN IT. Uniform clean design with representation. Easy to draw for the layman (fill both sides in with rainbow if you want), and easy to add specific representation

[-] november@lemmy.vg 1 points 1 week ago

deviation from heterosex

Totally normal words to say. BTW trans and intersex people can still be straight.

[-] Yermaw@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Better get it on the flag then ig

[-] november@lemmy.vg -1 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
34 points (90.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

41893 readers
259 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS