440
submitted 3 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] knightly@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago

Blaming voters for your candidates' failure sure is a good way to get more voters, isn't it?

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

mine? mate i’m not from your country

you just don’t seem to understand basic logic: people protest voted, and yall are now inflicting trump on the world

you had 3 options: protest vote, vote D, vote R

congrats you got R.. thats muuuuuuch better. i’m sure when the marines get deployed to your city you can be comforted by the fact that at least you sent the democrats a message!

how’s that going by the way? they listening? is it working? please tell me you at least achieved that! because if they haven’t listened, SHIT you got fascism AND a party that’s in every possible way “meh”

[-] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Zohran Mamdani won the NYC primary, so it sure sounds like the voters are paying attention.

Whether or not the party wants to listen is their perogative, so long as they claim to represent us they can rise or fall on the strength of their promises to us and our faith in their willingness to make good on those promises.

"Nothing will fundamentally change" sure isn't working as well as Obama's "hope and change", is it?

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, thats the exactly place to go hard left, full on no compromises. In the Democratic primaries.

Not in the presidential election when you know one of exactly two people will win and your choice is which one of them you favour over the other.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
440 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6854 readers
605 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS