2
submitted 2 weeks ago by jsomae@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think the more important takeaway from this article is not the political one, but that problems with a biological fix can be extremely easy to solve compared to problems that require societal change, even though we normally think of it as being the other way around.

[-] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I still feel that the distinction is not so clear.

Why is "banning lead" seen as a biological "change", but "banning soda" is tagged as a "social effort"?

I re-read it and I get a feeling that what it's talking about is not so much "biological" vs "social" but rather.. "physiological" vs "psychological", and arguing that psychology can be a lot more complex to deal with than physiology. Which I guess is fair.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Makes sense. Author is a psychologist.

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
2 points (62.5% liked)

Science

16573 readers
17 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS