187

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Trebuchet@europe.pub 12 points 6 months ago

Not sure we need to "cure" aging...

[-] IAmLamp@fedia.io 33 points 6 months ago

Could someone get to work on curing stupid first? Then we can work on the aging part.

[-] TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Everyone so concerned about artificial intelligence that they forgot natural stupidity is still the biggest unsolved issue.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

cf. “teachers”

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago

If we can live just as long as we do now but in better health it would be amazing.

[-] Trebuchet@europe.pub 1 points 6 months ago

100%

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sir/Madame Trebuchet, your cousins of the weighted blade are already a tried & true solution to aristocrat aging.

Also, I think I just found the name for my new anarcho metal band — if you're available to fill in on timpani/kettle drum, et al.

[-] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

Plenty of underfunded extremely disabling illnesses to spend money on instead of “curing” aging to fulfill rich able bodied people’s fantasies.

[-] blarghly@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Idk, I'm not rich and id like to stop getting older. Hell, if I could just stay my current age and then die of cancer in 30 years, that'd be great.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 6 months ago

Do you think it is not a widespread or harmful condition?

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025

187 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

3585 readers

23 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS