84
submitted 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

The countries committed to permanently ending fossil fuel use now far outnumber those against. Their problem? Their chief organising conference, the 30-year-old COP conferences, comes with vetoes from the petro-states. This year, 1,600 fossil industry lobbyists attended, and they managed to get any mention of fossil fuels scrubbed from the final agreement.

This ridiculous state of affairs can't continue, and this is a classic move to break the deadlock. Sideline COP & the petrostates, by creating an alternative, they don't have power in.

The first ever International Conference on the Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuels, scheduled for April 2026.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 8 points 16 hours ago

It's good news to see fossil fuel cars in such steep decline. This contrasts with the US, where gas cars are still near 90% of new sales. It's China and Europe who are embracing EVs the fastest, though in China, combustion engine cars are still near 50% of sales.

But it's not all good news. Half of those EVs are hybrid models. Data shows drivers with these still use a significant amount of gas, almost as much as ICE cars. The EU has set a 2035 deadline to ban all new gas car sales, and it seems that will include these polluting hybrid cars, too.

117
submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
21

A headline from earlier this week was 'Google DeepMind Hires Former CTO of Boston Dynamics as the Company Pushes Deeper Into Robotics'. Google once owned Boston Dynamics and sold it as they didn't think it had anything to sell. I bet they regret that now. Even its AI training data would have made it worth retaining. The things you don't see when you take the short-term view.

I wonder if that's the same with this warning from China's National Development and Reform Commission. Yes, humanoid robotics are at their gold rush stage, but that's because people know the future probably means billions of these robots, and trillions of profit building them. At the turn of the 20th century, the nascent automobile and aerospace industries had hundreds of small firms all over the world operating out of workshops. Robotics looks like it's at the same stage.

A humanoid robot-shaped bubble is forming, China warns

51

A large chunk of international trade is in dollars. Even though the US as a country is only 13.4% of global trade, over 40% of all global trade is invoiced in dollars. International banking (countries' foreign reserves, loans, & debt payments, etc) is even more dominated by the US dollar.

This fact has become weaponized in US foreign policy, with country after country having banking deposits frozen, or even being excluded from international banking altogether (via its SWIFT network backbone). Around the world, this is focusing other countries' minds on de-dollarizing global trade.

This foreign policy weaponization has now spread to tech platforms, too. This has led to a push for technology sovereignty, where countries like Canada & Europe are rapidly seeking alternatives to previously trusted US tech.

As sci-writer Cory Doctorow explains, this disentangling will be far from easy. China is already building much of an alternative international technology & financial infrastructure, but can it be trusted any more than the US? Probably not. The only alternatives may be decentralized, and building those may be a messy process.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

An irony here is I heard about this via an AI newsletter I subscribe to. It supports itself by selling ads for AI companies. The ad beside this story was AI-generated & touted a company called Genarena that sells AI-generated infographics. The example was a "Top 10 Liveable Global Cities", where the No 1 & No 2 spot were the same city ........

62
131

This year’s U.N. climate summit, COP30, has just ended in Brazil. There were 1,600 fossil fuel lobbyists in attendance, a bigger delegation than any other country, other than host Brazil. They managed to strip talk of a permanent transition from fossil fuels from the final agreement.

But they are only delaying the inevitable. Most countries want a permanent end to fossil fuels, and the action to make it happen is happening outside of structures that the fossil fuel industry can't subvert.

Uruguay is another sign that is happening. They used to say near-100% renewable power grids were impossible, but they were wrong. Some will say it still can't happen in big countries with heavy industry, but they'll be proved wrong, too.

Uruguay’s Renewable Charge: A Small Nation, A Big Lesson For The World

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 1 points 5 days ago
  • still want to read books made by humans.*

True. LLMs just regurgitate. Not just that, they have no point of view or inner life. I don't care what they think, in the way I might with James Joyce, Franz Kafka or Sylvia Plath.

That said, much of creative work is semi-automated already.

Is there really much true creativity in Hollywood superhero movies or TV soap operas? That kind of content seems like it could be largely done by AI.

109

"Closed models dominate, with on average 80% of monthly LLM tokens using closed models despite much higher prices - on average 6x the price of open models - and only modest performance advantages. Frontier open models typically reach performance parity with frontier closed models within months, suggesting relatively fast convergence. Nevertheless, users continue to select closed models even when open alternatives are cheaper and offer superior performance. This systematic underutilization is economically significant: reallocating demand from observably dominated closed models to superior open models would reduce average prices by over 70% and, when extrapolated to the total market, generate an estimated $24.8 billion in additional consumer savings across 2025."

This is another sign that the AI bubble almost certainly has to pop. But there's an interesting implication here. Will open-source AI inherit the future?

Linux, Android, MySQL, Git, WordPress - are just a few of the open-source software solutions that dominate modern software & the internet. Will the bedrock of 2030s AI be open-source?

The Latent Role of Open Models in the AI Economy

33
14

When people imagine the possible collapse of highly centralized systems, like food production & distribution in developed nations, they often assume the result can only mean disaster.

But renewables point to a different outcome - decentralized self-sufficiency.

With your own solar setup, you can power all your energy needs, including transport with EVs. Not only that, you can power all your basic metabolic needs. Living off nothing but Solein doesn't sound like much fun, but it's a complete protein, so at least it would be a healthy diet.

Decentralized renewable energy is spreading throughout the developed world; will decentralized renewable-powered food production follow?

Source 1 - Reinventing the Subsistence Economy How Energy and Food Decoupling Rewrite the Map of Post-Growth Futures

Source 2 - This Protein Powder Is Made Out of Air and Uses 600 Times Less Water Than Beef

14
12

"In addition, after pressure from the Trump administration in the US, the IEA has resurrected its “current policies scenario”, which – effectively – assumes that governments around the world abandon their stated intentions and only policies already set in legislation are continued."

The IEA has a decades-long history of vastly underestimating renewables adoption, but it has now truly entered the realms of the absurd and ridiculous. To reach these new fossil-fuel-friendly industry conclusions, it has to ignore different global government's stated Net Zero Commitments. Include them, and that alone sees oil use 77% lower in 2050.

Another thing they had to ignore? Electric Vehicle adoption. These new figures assume there won't be any more in the world in 2050 than today.

The truth is that global coal use is already in steep permanent decline, and oil will soon follow.

23
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 77 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is what is being banned.

  • AI used for social scoring (e.g., building risk profiles based on a person’s behavior).
  • AI that manipulates a person’s decisions subliminally or deceptively.
  • AI that exploits vulnerabilities like age, disability, or socioeconomic status.
  • AI that attempts to predict people committing crimes based on their appearance.
  • AI that uses biometrics to infer a person’s characteristics, like their sexual orientation.
  • AI that collects “real time” biometric data in public places for the purposes of law enforcement.
  • AI that tries to infer people’s emotions at work or school.
  • AI that creates — or expands — facial recognition databases by scraping images online or from security cameras.

Almost everything on this list is outlawing what an authoritarian regime would want. How long before the EU bans the American Big Tech AI, that it seems is toadying to Trump to enable it.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 154 points 10 months ago

So the same people who have no problem about using other people's copyrighted work, are now crying when the Chinese do the same to them? Find me a nano-scale violin so I can play a really sad song.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 66 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

DeepSeek buzz puts tech stocks on track for $1.2 trillion drop

Just a few months ago many American commenters thought their country was 'years ahead' of China when it came to AI dominance. That narrative has been blown out of the water.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 84 points 1 year ago

Microsoft has cash reserves of $75 billion.

Microsoft - If you really want to convince us that nuclear power is part of the future, why can't you use some of your own money? Why does every single nuclear suggestion always rely on bailouts from taxpayers? Here's a thought, if you can't pay for it yourself - just pick the cheaper option that taxpayers don't have to pay for - you know renewables and grid storage? The stuff that everybody else, all over the world, is building near 99% of new electricity generation with.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 184 points 1 year ago

As sad as this topic is, this is a much better way to go than a prolonged miserable painful death where you suffer the last months of a terminal disease.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 83 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Any time I hear claims that involve hitherto unknown laws of Physics I'm 99.99% sure I'm dealing with BS - but then again, some day someone will probably genuinely pull off such a discovery.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 190 points 2 years ago

Good news for pigs. I'll be delighted to see factory farming disappear and be replaced by tech like this.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 70 points 2 years ago

The Chinese automaker BYD reminds me of the famous phrase attributed to the sci-fi writer William Gibson - "The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed."

Future EV cars will be cheap to own and run. Self-driving tech will lower insurance costs. You can charge them with your home solar setup if you want. They'll last far longer with lower maintenance costs thanks to simple electric engines with few moving parts. As their construction gets more roboticized it will lower their costs further. The batteries that make up a huge chunk of their current costs are falling in price too. CATL, the world’s largest EV battery maker, is set to cut costs in half by mid 2024.

Some people still think gasoline and ICE cars have a long life ahead of them, and don't realize the industries behind both are dead men walking.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 196 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think fediverse people are wildly overestimating how much 99% of Reddit users care about this. The mod team on r/futurology (I'm one of them) set up a fediverse site just over a month ago (here you go - https://futurology.today/ ) It's been modestly successful so far, but the vast majority of subscribers seem to be coming from elsewhere in the fediverse, not migrants from Reddit.

This is despite the fact we've permanently stickied a post to the top of the sub. r/futurology has over 19 million subscribers, and yet the fediverse is only attracting a tiny trickle of them. I doubt most people on Reddit even know what the word fediverse means.

view more: next ›

Lugh

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF