286
I want some of that (cdn.discordapp.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] N1cknamed@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Is it idealistic? My country in western Europe is pretty corruption free as far as anyone can tell. Seems perfectly achievable to me.

[-] Zodiark@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

Just because your country legalizes its corruption and bribery does not make it "not corrupt". Your pirate ship being honest with its mode of operation, its objectives, and distribution of its loot does not negate its existence as an enterprise of plunder.

Consider: The wealth and living standard that western europe is sustained by is done through the exploitation of the developing world. Which means, as a bloc, those countries corrupt their own and their client states to accede to these exploitative relationships. What do you think ECOWAS and France are for if not for the exploitative relationship between France and its former colonies to maintain relationships of exploitation; what corruption do you think France makes their client states in ECWAS foster to undermine their own democratic processes in favor of the exploitation by France (and to a greater extent the entire Western world).

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

Corruption-free is when you have a government that works hand in glove with corporations to protect their interests and you have a revolving door between politics and mahogany row.

Corruption-free is when most corruption has been legalised through regulatory capture.

Corruption-free is when your supranational organisation is opaque, anti-democratic, and riddled with lobbyists.

You're not really going to tell me that there aren't countless examples of government corruption in Western Europe that I could point to, are you?

Keep in mind that China's population is 1.4 billion. Whichever country you happen to live in, I can tell you right now that its population pales in comparison. Of course there are going to be cases of corruption when you have a population that large.

[-] N1cknamed@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The EU is of course famous for not protecting consumer interests or regulating corporations. They never do such a thing.

Compared to the US, where the government does everything in its power to protect the status quo of the wealthy, or China, where the people can't even vote for, let alone criticize their own government, European countries seem to be making quite a good effort to accommodate the will of the common man.

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of whataboutism and goalpost-shifting that you're doing there. I never claimed that the EU doesn't ever pass consumer protection laws or that they never regulate corporations.

In fact, implicit in my argument about regulatory capture is the notion that there exists regulatory bodies who are performing the function of regulation of the market whose interests get perverted by the appointment of business people and executives, often from the exact same industries which said regulatory body oversees. So pointing out that regulatory bodies regulate in the EU is no more proof to the contrary of the existence of regulatory capture than using ice-skates on a hockey rink disproves the fact that ice-skates are designed for use on ice.

You must be pretty across China to be able to make a call like "let alone criticize their own government".

I take it that you don't consider the White Paper Protests to be criticisms of the Chinese government and its COVID policy for some reason? Have you just not looked into this protest or is there some other reason why it's not an example of Chinese citizens voicing criticisms of their government?

And as for elections, China has them. (Remind me again how people are elected to the European Commission, the Secretariat of the European Parliament, the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, and the Committee of Permanent Representatives...)

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I hear you, I hear you, but does China even have changedotorg and fearless journalists willing to speak truths handed down by power?

[-] NPa@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

as far as anyone can tell

wtyp people in Europe are naive idiots when it comes to identifying corruption

[-] N1cknamed@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Or... we actually did something about it, and as a result enjoy some of the highest standards of living on the planet. But sure, we should strive to live more like the Chinese do.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 1 year ago

Yes, your legislators renamed it lobbying or consultancy. Now corruption doesn't exist.

[-] N1cknamed@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I don't really care what they've done. All that I know is that the parties I've voted for generally vote in my interests, and that actual noticeable change comes from it. As a result I enjoy high standards of living. The impression I get from my government is that they're genuinely trying to make things better for their citizens (even if it doesn't always work out). That's all I really need to know.

If corruption/lobbying is somehow rampant, it hasn't stopped many legislative measures to protect my interests. A good recent example is the many actions the EU has taken against anti-consumer tech giants. I lobbying was a thing here, do you think that would've happened? God knows these companies have the money.

I'm not omniscient, but I think we're doing quite alright.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

So by the same standard, if China, for example, were to lift 800 million people out of poverty, a little corruption would be okay?

As lobbying is a fact throughout Europe, yes, I think the fact of gains and the fact of corruption can happen at the same time.

For another look at a contradictory unity of opposites, here's a look at how the corrupt EU is willing to fund research into combatting excessive PFAS in water while at the same time allowing companies to pump excessive PFAS into the water: https://www.uva.nl/en/content/news/news/2023/02/pfas-in-drinking-water.html?cb

[-] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

Right, that’s why you have this standard of living, not centuries of colonial exploitation of the Global South

[-] N1cknamed@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

We were prosperous long before that and are prosperous long after that.

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, "Museum of mercantalist past"?

Wonder what exhibits they have...

Huh, so that's how they got prosperous.

Theft.

[-] Redbolshevik2@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Laughable. Europe outside of Constantinople was a backwards shithole that needed to purchase all its manufactured goods from the superior civilizations of India and China. Absolutely nothing before colonialism.

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Ekhem.

Istanbul.

You don't want to be called a :LIB: by me, the one true leftist, now do you? :smuglord:

[-] duderium@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Europe was a backward hellhole before the 1500s and wasn’t really “modern” by any standard until the 19th century, which very curiously coincided with the Scramble for Africa. Hmm, interesting.

Edit: so you’re Dutch. Isn’t the Netherlands’s wealth built on slavery? Why didn’t you guys give all that stolen money back?

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Didn't you hear? They spent it and everything they have since the 1960s is due to hard work and intelligence (just don't ask whose).

[-] Judge_Jury@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

After? It's ongoing

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
286 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13511 readers
1347 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS